So far, I am about half done with my paper. As I wrote my outline, I was afraid I wouldn't have enough information to discuss in the paper. Luckily, I realized early that I wouldn't be able to base my whole paper off McCloud's theory of cartooning, so I have been able to incorporate elements of the Naghibi/O'Malley text along with the "Graphic Narrative as a Witness" article as well.
Monday, December 3, 2012
Blog Post 12/3-Final Paper
When deciding what text I wanted to write about for the final paper (Curious Case or Persepolis), I looked at what theoretical articles fascinated me most. I personally enjoyed the article written by Naghibi and O'Malley that discusses Satrapi's familiarization of the "eastern culture" for the "Western audience." While those comparisons may be interesting, I found their brief reference to Scott McCloud's cartooning theory the most applicable to what I want to write about. I immediately started to make a connection to the "identity" issue that plaques Satrapi throughout the text to the identity that she places on her drawings, or "cartoons."
So far, I am about half done with my paper. As I wrote my outline, I was afraid I wouldn't have enough information to discuss in the paper. Luckily, I realized early that I wouldn't be able to base my whole paper off McCloud's theory of cartooning, so I have been able to incorporate elements of the Naghibi/O'Malley text along with the "Graphic Narrative as a Witness" article as well.
So far, I am about half done with my paper. As I wrote my outline, I was afraid I wouldn't have enough information to discuss in the paper. Luckily, I realized early that I wouldn't be able to base my whole paper off McCloud's theory of cartooning, so I have been able to incorporate elements of the Naghibi/O'Malley text along with the "Graphic Narrative as a Witness" article as well.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Sounds like a great start. Happy to chat more after class or during office hours as desired...
ReplyDeletebest,
NP